Why are remux files so big.
4K is just a resolution (typically 3840x2160 pixels.
Why are remux files so big those guys take forever and pay attention to the easy stuff like banding and artifacts looking for "transparent" encodes. So if you have the storage available and a display that you think will benefit from the extra data, do Remux Reply Uh huh. Be the first to comment Nobody's responded to this post yet. Is the lack of quality loss worth it for the much larger file sizes? Im guessing for those of us without massive setups it's probably not worth it? Reply reply Neat_Onion • I do notice the quality Remux is the entire video file as it was encoded on the disk so there is no quality loss. 1. So when you author the DVD, it will lower the resolution and the file size and it will fit easily. File Size. ts container that gets "lost" during I use an automatic transcoding solution (Tdarr - though I occasionally tweak the RF target per-show) and an efficient codec + OPUS audio at transparent bitrates (448k for Generally remuxes are better in every way, but if you're watching on a tv instead of pc, you might not notice the difference (depending on distance from the tv and such). Sorry if this is a common question. 58GB. I recently purchased a blu-ray drive for my rig and I was wondering the difference between a Blu-Ray "rip" and "remux". Is there a correlation with these file sizes with the image quality or DV files just better compressed? And especially even more so, On average, MP4 files are usually uploaded somewhere between 1GB to 10GB. I think so. The largest Blu-Ray video disc can be is 50GB so no rip of a Blu-Ray video disc can be larger than 50GB. 1) NEVER RECORD TO MP4 DIRECTLY, FOR ANY REASON. These files are usually in one of the known container formats. Good encodes (DON, SbR, etc) you will not notice the difference between the remux and the encode. Keep in mind most of the MKV files are large HD files that I am converting from Make MKV for A video DVD is encoded using the MPEG-2 codec and is a standard definition format (720 x 480 NTSC). Same with audio encoding. Cause there are groups who put all kinds of different audio track in encode and cause of that file size is bigger then some e. But also bigger file size doesn't always mean better quallity. 4K is just a resolution (typically 3840x2160 pixels. Does MP4 play better in some/all editors? Are there limitations to editing MKV files instead of remuxing them first? I'd love to know. Secondly, Remux is basically the highest version of a Blu-ray/uhd for general all-around viewing. That's one reason why older movies look so great in 4K and why they are Most likely the term remux means it's the original compression off the source disk, untouched, just repackaged. 3GB might be enough for a 720p encode. So, record in MKV format, and then remux it to MP4 after the recording by going to “File” > “Remux Recordings”. Of course, it depends on the length of the video and the quality, but generally speaking, you're looking at 4K video up to 20 minutes or 8K video up Which explains why the files are so much larger. If the quality cant be keep, why don't call "Encode" or "Rip" ? - The other method backup is: "Remux". In the "Recording" tab, if you set the "Recording Format" to MP4 previously, remember to set it to the default "MKV" format. Titles that originally added more grain for effect might have worked back when DVD's were popular but now with increased resolution the grain is not only over emphasized, it's borderline unwatchable no matter the artistic impression intended. If you want to watch HDR on your desktop, you will need to use MPV Shim. You may see the notice when changing the "Recording Format" to "MP4". :V The drawback is that you don't really know how large the files might be, but I don't think that's an issue unless you're aiming to upload a file to some site DVD remuxes don’t tend to mix in other source elements, so at best the advantage is a single file MKV, which I do like the convenience of, but offers no change to the file size. Same with 4K REMUX and compressed versions. Share Add a Comment. Then you have to worry about the end device compatibility with the x265 format. The biggest difference would be seen between webdl and the remux as the webdl almost certainly doesn't have enough bitrate. So rounding ABOVE 50GB is a HUGE mistake. g. File size is another factor to consider when choosing between Remux and UHD. FAQ Uhm if i use make mkv my files size coming from bluray is around 50 GB so it's normal for this high quality. You can play around with stuff like this in HandBrake, transcoding files to various levels of compression and comparing inbetween them. All these comments about HEVC x265 encoding are irrelevant. ) The video bit rate, and to a lesser extent the audio bit depth, is what determines the quality of the video/audio and more importantly the file size. So they already have a larger data set compared to the newer digital-only movies. Why is that ? What is inside the . . P. 1080p at that size you'd start to see That CANNOT change just because of a simple remux; it is an encoding setting. New comments cannot be posted. Either the discs they were ripped from WERE slightly different discs, encoded differently, or I'd take that bet. EDIT: Thank you so much for the replies folks! Given two files using same container and encoded to the same standard with one having a higher bitrate, the one with a larger file size will always be better quality because it contains more information. 50TB of MakeMKV full rips (called Remux) is about 1,650 movies (assuming 30GB each). So I experimented REPEATEDLY with All remastered titles to 4k have excessive grain because 4k enhances it. So for those seeking the full disc, it’s likely they’ll just stick with ISO/VideoTS and get to keep the disc menus, etc. What software should I use to rip my blu-rays onto my hard drive? I want the quality to be exactly the same as I play them on my PS3. On the go watching? How many 4K REMUX movies will you be able to take? They are also the biggest file size. ts file) of a satellite recording to mkv, file size shrinks considerably. UHD files may also include high-quality audio tracks, but they are more likely to be compressed compared to Remux files. They are also the biggest file size. Remux is Blu-ray converted to a normal video file so the quality is the same as Blu-ray. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I'm using Xilisoft Video Converter. Even though Jellyfin Media Player can direct play HEVC, the way that the rendering engine works it will always locally tone map HDR to SDR. If you have the space, do remux. Xyren and dfsdfgfkjsefoiqzemnd; 1 1 Link to comment Remux, 25-30GB. So Im recording in 1080p 60fps and I get this issue where the file size displays as much less than it is, I recorded a 2hr video that made 200gb of my Storage become used, Fair enough I thought though where the file was stored it sayd it was 12 gigs or so, When I deleted it only those 12 gigs disappeared, This happenes with all my videos where file size is weirdly Why some torrents have such a big size difference even tho they are the same quality? Question Locked post. I'm trying to convert a video from MKV to MP4 and noticed a pretty large discrepancy between the file sizes. A single 8TB drive would hold about 250 movies. Record to MKV, and remux to MP4 after the recording is complete from OBS' File menu, Remux Hi. When searching for torrent files, the HDR10 results (non remux) files are usually bigger than the DV files. Add First thing first: What does digital video consist of? Digital video files are very complex files. HorribleSubs never encoded their releases, which is why individual episodes were Are the large files remux? If so, grain could be part of the file that was filtered out on lower quality files. internal group release cause internal focuses on picture and audio quallity not quantity of the files in encode or even remux. The original MKV file is only 448MB and after the conversion to MP4 (using the HD - MPEG4 option) the file is 3. What is reasonable Handbrake works just fine I do a fair amount of MKV to MP4 conversion and have found Handbrake to do an adequate job. While some files will make it through just fine, Handbrake is an 8-bit-color path internally, so even if you set it to 10-bit or 12-bit output, you're losing color data along the way. It is not a recording-safe format; if anything goes wrong during the recording, even for a split second, the ENTIRE recording will be corrupted and absolutely not recoverable by any means. I did try to google this a few times, and all I could find was "how to remux" type posts, not "why" to remux. S. As far as I have gathered from various BT sites, a "remux" file is much larger than a "rip". The easiest thing is to just keep your MakeMKV remux files as-is and use Plex or Emby as the server. Compression can matter a ton when it comes to file sizes, though at the upper level the differences are not very noticeable. Experiment with values between 15-25, which still gives reasonably When it comes to file sizes, the resolution itself is only a part of the problem. Most likely you are saving your movie to a file in HD resolution (1920 x 1080) and that is why it seems bigger. Many anime torrents have HEVC because it lowers the file size, usually blu ray releases since they're so large. 4K REMUX files can be very very large. But I didn't want to sacrifice storage like that. You can encode and still have an MP4 file and never encode to MKV. It's basically lossless While other files have been encoded into lossy formats and maybe got rid of unnecessary data like different audio languages. They said Remux will keep orginal quality. Even if you do notice it Blu-ray is usually the highest quality actual release with the biggest file size. So to answer the question - blu-ray movies are big to give the viewer the highest possible Quality Settings (File Size) On the Radarr/Sonarr Discord people often ask, “What's the best quality size settings to use?” “Why are the ones from the TRaSH Guides so different from the default settings?” Even though it is a personal preference, we will show you some recommendations to prevent low-quality or fake releases. I did not understand what you mean exactly, regarding 800 or 1080 lines height, but remultiplexing won't change that; letterboxes can be either encoded in the video, or added by a player to fill the screen when playing in fullscreen mode, you will spot the difference in windowed mode. Having the same quality as the original with all the stuff you want is a no brainer and with remux you always have the master file so you can make your own encode to whatever you want in the future. Remultiplexing means: Don't change the content, only put it in a new container. With this method, they can choose to keep disc menu or not, and remove some unnecessary stuff like some audio streams. Step 3. Assuming your goal is quality over file sizes, remuxing would be better as it doesn't involve re-encoding the video file (just putting the same quality video file inside an It can be from to 0=no detail removed to 50=so much detail removed that only a bloody mess remains. MP4 is not a recording-safe format. So a larger bit rate = a larger file size. If you have the storage space, sure, keep the 4K REMUX files and play them, blissfully unaware that you can, in fact, compress them down for more efficient storage and transfer and do so while being perceptually identical. Bluray could mean a lot of things perhaps a encode or maybe the full disk image you have to check the torrent files to be sure. then so on and so forth till im downloading huge remux files, LOTR one of the films is 150 gigs they files get so big. And the size of movie after remux isn't too small to orginal disc. While the typical ISO of a Blu-Ray disc can be in the range of 30-45GB, however these include all the extras. Remux files are typically larger in size compared to UHD files due to their uncompressed nature. thwhkfyylrdafsfpnzcpxruaekuqdpnozbxcqttjfrdjowzstxjtbxeytijgvetzzpmkpcbie