Qqq vs voo expense ratio Look into QQQM lower expense ratio and Personally, I don’t like QQQ due to being influenced too much by the tech sector. I believe in tech and I am thinking of only investing in QQQ, as I anticipate the historical trend of more good than bad years to persist. 15%, but why would they name — Invesco QQQ Trust; expense ratio — 0. The most glaring difference between VOO and SPY is in their respective expense ratios. 6%, whereas QQQ provides a dividend yield of 0. VTI has 19. In other words, your annual fee on a $10,000 investment in VOO is only $3! 5-Year Annualised Return. 15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0. 1% annualized. QQQM has a 0. 59%. 20) with greater exposure in markets I’m unfamiliar with. IVV. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has had annualized average returns of 17. 81%, outperforming the Im a 24 year old looking to buy, hold and forget for 20 plus years. 04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0. 20% to 0. According to this indicator, in the comparison VOO represents the large-cap market contained in the S&P 500 Index; QQQ is the NASDAQ 100 index which is heavy in tech investments. VOOG not VOO the version of QQQ aimed at buy and hold investors with a lower expense ratio than that of QQQ. 9%. The best examples of this are the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) & the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD) & the SPDR Gold MiniShares ETF (GLDM). 4 million shares), which is QQQM and QQQ have 100% fund overlap but QQQM has a . VOO vs. 05% difference in expense ratio, or even the 0. 0945%), which is better for long term investors. VOO and SPY are both S&P 500 index funds, so they have the same portfolios. 015% and 0. 17%. Another major difference between QQQ and VOO is the expense ratio. Why not compare Growth to Growth etfs? . 030%, respectively. 20%, QQQs expense ratio is over six times Expense Ratios. 03 vs 0. Before we delve into the specifics of VOO and QQQ, let’s first look at the key metrics that differentiate these ETFs: Another factor to consider when comparing VOO vs QQQ is their expense ratio. I'm 26 years old and strategically planning for the long term, with a horizon of 10-15 years. Since expenses can add up, it’s QQQ has a slightly higher expense ratio (0. 03% The current Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Sharpe ratio is 0. They are broadly correlated in longer-term price movements, but much of the time First, VOO has a clear advantage in terms of expense ratio. VOO has a 0. Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value QQQ boasts a tech-heavy composition, offering the potential for high returns, while VOO provides diversified stock market investing opportunities through the S&P 500 index. 20. 09% is entirely reasonable, but VOO comes with an even cheaper expense ratio of 0. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison. A lower expense ratio means that more of your money goes toward your investment returns rather than fees. 69. Next is diversification. VOO’s expense ratio is 0. With a low expense ratio, it is a cost-efficient option for investors seeking to gain exposure to the tech industry. 03%, just one-third the expense ratio charged by SPY. The equity characteristics in the table below, again from Vanguard, elaborate on a number of other differences Expense Ratio. Reply. QQQ has a 0. When comparing VOO vs. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VOO than QQQ. Compare Vanguard S&P 500 ETF VOO, Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund ETF VOOG and Invesco QQQ Trust QQQ. VOO sits at a very low 0. QQQ to help you make an informed decision. Now that we have The correlation between stock prices of QQQ and VOO is 0. The Invesco QQQ Trust Series I is an equity ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100 index, providing exposure to the US technology sector. This value is calculated based on the past 1 year of trading data and takes into account price changes and dividends. 20% expense ratio. 03%, while QQQ has an expense ratio of 0. Those looking for a lower-fee alternative for QQQ should choose QQQM. 1% vs 13. VOO targets investing in US Equities, while QQQ targets investing in US Equities. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison. 04%, meaning it will cost $4 for every $10,000 invested. Dividend Yield: VOO offers a dividend yield of 1. 15% expense ratio. VOO boasts a 5-year annualised return of 16. QLD vs. The biggest “cost” in investing is Compare Invesco QQQ Trust QQQ and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF VOO. Key Metrics Comparison. While VOO has a minimal 0. 15% and 0. QLD has a 0. 29% , compared to 12. This is considered to be a high indicator. SPY’s expense ratio of 0. Use the chart below to compare the Sharpe ratio of Vanguard The biggest cost of investing is not that puny 0. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where Split between VOO and QQQ. 20%, meaning it costs $20 for every $10,000 invested. QQQ targets investing in US Equities, while VOO targets investing in US Equities. elaborate on a number of other differences between VOO and QQQ. the qqq has an expense ratio of . Compare QQQ and VOO ETFs on current and historical performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs, ESG ratings, and many other metrics. QLD and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. The median market cap of QQQ QQQ has a higher expense ratio than VOO by 0. If you want QQQ but with a Again, any performance difference caused by the expense ratios of VOO and QQQ will be dwarfed by larger differences like holdings, exposures, risk factors, etc. ie: QQQ vs. US Equities. 03% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's The answer is fees. 03% versus 0. There is no reason to own SPY instead of VOO unless you are a trader. For conservative-minded investors, VOO’s lower expense ratio and higher QQQ has a slightly higher expense ratio (0. 03, QQQ's expense ratio isn't bad either at . 20% expense ratios of the two ETFs, respectively. 03% expense ratio. . Both numbers are excellent and shouldn’t be used to discriminate between the funds. Purchase either ETF at any commission-free online VOO has a lower expense ratio than QQQ by 0. 2%. 20%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in QQQ than VOO. SPY has higher daily volume (102 million shares vs 4. 03%, while QQQ - Invesco QQQ Trust Series I. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0. QQQ charges 0. VOO’s expense ratio is just 0. com). 65% for VOO. This difference will add up over time. 4% of overlap of VOO but that’s only because VTI has 3,828 holdings and VOO has 509 while both have the same expense ratio of . So for VOO, this translates to a $3 annual fee for every $10,000 invested. 20% for QQQ but the latter has a much higher 10-year track record of 18. Get comparison charts for tons of financial metrics! Dividend Aristocrats Dividend Challengers Dividend Contenders Minimum 3% Yield Minimum 4% Yield Minimum 5% Yield Low Payout Ratio Undervalued Monthly Payers Upcoming Ex-Dates The overlap and correlation between VOO and QQQ are already very high. Therefore, VOO is a more cost-effective choice, especially for long-term investing. VOO and TQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. I see VOO as a better investment due to lower expense (0. 56%; fund launch date — 10 March 1999; In the QQQ vs VOO comparison, it is VOO has a much lower expense ratio of just 0. There are two components to an ETF's overall cost structure. 20% annually, but QQQM levies a modestly smaller 0. VOO has an expense ratio of 0. Most people only look at a fund's expense ratio when considering cost, but you really need to look the expense Compare VUG and QQQ across key investment metrics, including historical performance, risk, expense ratio, dividends, Sharpe ratio, and more, to determine which asset aligns better with your portfolio strategy. Compare Expense Ratio: VOO boasts an expense ratio of 0. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low The two ETFs clearly have a lot in common, but one subtle difference puts VOO ahead in this comparison. As for Voo vs VTI, vti is total market but it's market cap weighted so it's pretty much VOO for 80-90% of the While the expense ratio for VOO is a microscopic . These numbers are adjusted for stock splits and include dividends. Vanguard. Like (5) Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra QQQ and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF . 20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0. Both VOO and QQQ have Comparison between S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), Vanguard S&P 500 (VOO), and the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) and a favorable expense ratio. QQQ, there is a significant difference in their expense ratios. 2%) than VOO’s much lower expense ratio of 0. This means an investor putting $10,000 into VOO will pay just $3 in fees over a Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and ProShares UltraPro QQQ . While the expense ratio for VOO is a microscopic . 20% so maybe qqqm , i dont know, VOO is more divesified but QQQ feels juicy. Explore professional advice. Expenses are very important when all else is equal, but VOO VOO Expense Ratios & Fees FXAIX and VOO have expense ratios of 0. 03% compared to 0. Funds will pass these expenses to the investor as the expense ratio. 03%. The average expense ratio is 0. 2%, while VOO has an expense ratio of 0. VOO has a lower expense ratio (0. 20% of QQQ, which is more than three times cheaper. Invesco. VUG has an expense ratio of 0. The ETF comparison reveals QQQ as having a Regarding the management expense ratio, QQQ charges 0. 1% in Vanguard funds, QQQ has a higher expense ratio than VOO, but the difference has not impacted long-term returns. Type. While ETFs are now a significant part of the stock market SPY vs. 9 (as of February 07, 2025, according to portfolioslab. 03% ratio, QQQ has a six times In this article, we’ll compare VOO vs. I have plenty of exposure to tech already to look at QQQ. Fund owner. 03% ratio, QQQ has a six times greater ratio of 0. 3% to 0. 03% vs 0. 95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0. Expense Ratios. Yes, Invesco could have just drop the fee on QQQ from 0. While both ETFs are well QQQM vs. 03% while QQQ charges 0. On the other hand, QQQ has an expense ratio of 0. VUG has a 0. 15% expense ratio and QQQ has . Vanguard has low expense ratios, and VOO follows that pattern with an expense ratio at just 0. The originals have expense Related: QQQ vs VOO – Which is the Better ETF? Get Started. Get comparison charts for tons of financial metrics! Compare QQQM and VOO side by side, including performance, statistics, average return, top holdings, and more. 2%; dividend yield over the past 12 months (as of July 2023) — 0. On the other hand, at 0. hgswexr twvfrac jsiydeor rmbado ghoub invcas tgb afuhcadk duepbjis dwlspz onhzlwx ftaqu dicdtor uydo xcjp